home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- > On Tue, 16 Jan 1996, Magnus Kollberg wrote:
- >
- > > BTW. I did an simple test with a smaller view on my VGA. I used the 160x200
- > > resolution but not the real one, I just changed the viewport to 160x200,
- > > not the "real" resolution. I don't know if this can be compared to a "real"
- > > res. change but not to far I think. Anyhow, it were indeed faster. I tried it on
- > > the 030 version (no DSP) and running in 160x200 insteed of 320x200 gave an
- > > speed increase between 50-70% and it were even 5-10% faster than the DSP version.
- > > Not too bad I think. :-) It looks like this turbo mode can boost BM to some nice
- > > levels. :-)
- >
- > Using 160 in stretched mode is a bit slower than decreasing the screen
- > sice, since you have to update 4 bytes instead of 2 each pixel.
-
- Okey, but the 320x200 resolution with an 160x200 view that I used takes more
- bandwidth than a real 160x200 so it will maybe compensate each other, or?
-
- //Magnus Kollberg
-
-